ACHUKAreviews

  • Back to main ACHUKA page…

Long Reach

February 22, 2011 By achuka 2 Comments

Peter Cocks

Walker Books

9781406324754

January 2011

402 pp

stopped at p92

Read On? NO

It’s getting difficult to actually finish some of the books I pick up these days, so I have decided that, rather than ignore them, it would be better to confront the situation and actually record the point at which I give up on a book, for whatever reason.
Sometimes it is the awkwardness of the prose. I was once at a launch party and was discussing with the husband of a fellow reviewer why he did not read children’s books. He picked up a copy of the launch title, opened it at the first page, and seemingly at random pointed at a sentence in the middle of a paragraph. He didn’t need to add any further explanation. It was a horribly worded sentence. Children love a good story and will happily pass over stylistic hiccups if the narrative is sufficiently gripping. This, it seems to me, is taken too much for granted by contemporary children’s authors and their editors. There are too many books that are awkward to read aloud, that have a sentence to stumble over on every page.
Sometimes, I find myself thinking ‘Who on earth is the target readership for this title?’ Largely because of the 17yr old character’s life amid “fast cars and flash women” you are probably talking Y7+ or age 12+ here. But by 14+, if not earlier, surely any adolescent boy (this is male-oriented writing) wanting to read a good thriller will be turning to a fully-blown adult thriller, something a little more savage than Eddie Savage. So the target audience is very narrow indeed, and one notoriously difficult to reach.
It’s a shame because Cocks writes well enough and the book grabs the attention at the start. But it falls hopelessly in between the appetite for true juvenile thriller-writing, as so well served by the likes of Horowitz, and the adult genre. Cocks and his publisher clearly think there is some middle ground waiting to be served. I think they’re wrong. It takes a quirky one-off like Kevin Brooks to really reach the teenage audience with thriller-style material.

Tweet

Filed Under: Fiction, Mystery/Thriller, Teen/YA

Social

  • View achuka’s profile on Twitter

Comments

  1. Gill says

    February 24, 2011 at 6:12 pm

    As the publisher of Long Reach I am happy to confirm that this book was truly intended for readers of 14+ and that is why the package is sophisticated and appropriate to the adult genre. And I agree that the ground where one might appeal to teens boy readers can be very narrow as they do, indeed, move to Stephen King in the blink of an eye. But I believe that we have evidence that the readership for Peter’s book is considerably broader than even we had hoped. The reader reviews posted by Waterstone’s are from many in their 20s and 30s and even some 50+, so I really feel that we have published a book which can appeal to 14+ precisely because it has the right adult feel and texture. I also think we have found new ground for fathers and sons to share and am excited by exactly how right we are to have published into this ‘middle ground’. It’s looking very successful from our point of view, I’m pleased to report.

    Log in to Reply
  2. alisondo says

    March 19, 2011 at 6:11 pm

    I think this raises a very interesting question : just how (or why) do we define a children’s book? I have read two books recently which illustrate this dilemma: ‘Pigeon English’ by Stephen Kelman, published as an adult book, and ‘ Out of Shadows’ by Jason Wallace, which won the children’s book category of the Costa book prize. Yet of the two, I would more happily recommend ‘Pigeon English’ to, say, a 13 year old than the Jason Wallace, because although the book is violent and the ending tragic, the young protagonist has humour and a passion for life.’Out of Shadows’, on the other hand, is unrelentingly bleak and grim, with virtually no characters who are not either weak or deeply unpleasant. So what makes this a children’s book and ‘Pigeon English’ not? Perhaps the answer is that the distinction is meaningless: they are both powerful books whch could be enjoyed by any one over the age of 13. So perhaps the time has come to abolish the category ‘teenage novel’ altogether? What do you think?

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories

  • Adult
  • Audiobook
  • Chapter Books
  • Counting
  • Drama
  • Early Readers
  • Fairytales & Retellings
  • Fantasy
  • Fiction
  • Graphic Novels
  • Historical
  • Humour
  • Mystery/Thriller
  • Non-Fiction
  • Picture Books
  • Poetry
  • Pop-Ups
  • Reference
  • SciFi
  • Series
  • Teen/YA
  • Uncategorized
  • War

Archives

  • August 2018
  • February 2018
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • November 2011
  • September 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • September 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • March 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005

Copyright ACHUKA © 2021 · designed on Genesis Framework