Mai Lin Li's
review:
I
first read The Merchant of Venice while studying for GCSE
English. Roughly half of the population of my school was Jewish,
the other half predominantly Christian, so as you can imagine the
play provoked a great deal of debate. Had Pressler's book been published
ten years ago, I think it could have made a useful contribution
to the discussions that ensued.
In
a serious and thoughtful book, Pressler develops themes present
in the play, such as racial and religious bigotry, familial and
sexual love and perceptions of justice, while indirectly reminding
us of their modern resonance. Where I think the book departs radically
from the play is in the shift from the original focus of ambiguity
i.e. the question of Shylock's status as victim or villain. The
balance is tipped distinctly in his favour by Pressler's decision
to attribute the insistence on a flesh bond to Antonio and allowing
Shylock to observe that it was a known Christian practice. In Pressler's
narrative this ambiguity is replaced by another important question;
who is more compromised (and made more wretched) by their decisions
and behaviour, the self-exiled Jew Shylock, or his converted daughter
Jessica? Another innovation is the creation of Dalilah, who proves
herself to be a good and dutiful Jewish daughter to Shylock, despite
being habitually eclipsed in his affections by the proud, beautiful
Jessica. Interestingly, while travelling through the countryside
in order to return Jessica to her father, Dalilah becomes the only
Jewish character to experience kindness and 'Christian' charity,
though it is significant that this happens when she is in disguise
and divested of any outward signs of her Jewish status. I enjoyed
the description of this interlude, but while Dalilah's story is
skilfully interwoven with that of Jessica, I think that some readers
may find that it distances and weakens the relationship between
Shakespeare's play and Pressler's otherwise impressive and atmospheric
novel.
Mai
Lin Li is a librarian in Nottinghamshire.