| |
|
1.
When did you start writing together?
|
|
The
memorable year of 1987 - no, I tell a lie, it was '86…or was
it '88? Anyway, it was memorable...
|
 2.
How does the collaboration process work? It's been said that Barlow
does the vowels and Skidmore does the consonants. Is there another
story? |
|
Yes.
Once upon a time there was a beautiful frog and a hideous, warty
princess… Once we have an idea (hopefully better than the one
above) we work collaboratively - we both have a Performing Arts
background, and this comes naturally. So we try things out,
role play, improvise - then we plan, go away and write sections,
get back together again, rewrite…and before we send anything
off to publishers, we read it aloud from line one to the end,
editing as we go.
|
 3.
Your latest series for Puffin, 'Vernon Bright...' has a Science
focus, previous series having been history or myth based. Do you
think the fact that you are not writing pure fiction, but fiction
peppered with humorously presented information is a factor in
its popularity with boys? |
|
Possibly.
Boys tend to like factual material. But no matter what our initial
stimulus might be, we concentrate on humour, dialogue, pacy plots,
slightly larger-than-life characters and situations. It will be
interesting to see whether our latest series for Collins, Tales
from the Dark Forest, is popular with the same audience, since
it isn't fact-based. Ask us again in six months. |
| 4.
Do you have a target audience in mind when writing? |
|
Yes,
but it's a moving target.
|
 5.
The latest Vernon Bright title is Vernon Bright and The Faster-Than-Light
Show. It opens with a typically well-realised set-piece that involves
a school orchestra's attempts to perform Tchaikovsky's 1812 Overture
with Vernon, on the lights, attempting to add some atmosphere
at the climax. Who thought up that opening? Who wrote it? |
|
 That's
a Barlow bit. It's an illustration of what we always tell students
- 'The most convincing writing is always based on your own experiences'.
Some
time ago I was building a set for a show, and a guy called Pete
was making the props. He had to make a cannon that actually
went 'bang'. So I said, 'Just make the cannon, and we'll set
a maroon (theatre jargon for an explosive charge) off in a bomb
tank' (which is a special tank made of toughened steel so as
to be blast proof) and Pete said, 'No, that won't be very convincing,
I'll build a bomb tank into the cannon'.
So
he made a bomb tank out of an old ammunition box and drilled
holes in it to let the blast out. Then he rigged up the charge
to the pyrotechnics control unit (which had a Big Red Button).
At this point, I said, 'I think I'll just go outside for a bit'
and Pete said, 'Don't be daft, it's perfectly safe'.
So
I went outside and after a while there was an almighty bang
and all the windows shook and a couple of tiles fell off the
roof and all the pigeons flew away, and I went back in and there
was Pete looking a bit windswept and staring at the ammunition
box, which used to be rectangular but was now a sphere. So Pete
said, 'We'd better try a smaller charge', and I said, 'We'd
better hire a bomb tank'.
Years
later, when we were writing the book, I remembered the story
and thought, 'If that's what Pete managed to do with one cannon,
what would Bright do with a performance of the 1812?'
|
| 6.
A lot of the repartee in the Vernon Bright books is between Bright
and his friend John. Does this lend itself to performance when
you visit schools? |
|
 Yes.
It's the Performing Arts thing again - we write dialogue as
directors. Spot the stage directions. Barlow tends to read Bright,
and Skidmore reads John and Dodgy Dave. I don't think we'll
go any further into that…
|
| 7.
As well as doing events for children, you are also involved in
In-Service Literacy Training for teachers and librarians. Why
do you think this side of your work is important? |
|
 Because
it's vital that we engage and enthuse kids in the business of
reading, and we want to pass on what we've learnt to the people
at the ink-face. Most of the kids we see, we will only meet
for a couple of hours at best. Librarians and teachers work
with them every day. Hopefully, it might also provide some light
relief in an inset programme that often and perforce has to
deal with how to fill in the hundredweight of forms that lands
on teachers' desks every week.
|
| 8.
One of the Inset sessions you offer is about
Reluctant Readers. It presents "strategies for the selection,
presentation and use of material to motivate the reluctant and
struggling reader". In your role as editors for Heinemann's High
Impact series, what are your essential criteria for material aimed
at reluctant readers? |
 This
answer could extend to a doctorial thesis. In brief:
· It must be written in language accessible to the reader
· The subject matter must reflect the interest level and emotional
maturity of the reader
· It must be attractively packaged (design is vital. The covers
must be arresting, the text layout non-threatening, inside illustrations
helpful, font size appropriate…etc)
· It must engage the readers' interest from the first page to
the last. Readers must be motivated to turn every page.
· There has to be a variety of material.
· The series must allow for progression.
· Any title must undergo a successful trial with its intended
audience.
· The writing must be good. If a reader isn't turned on by good
books, why on Earth would he/she be turned on by bad ones? |
 9.
What ARE the keys to selecting and presenting material for reluctant
readers and who, in your view, apart from yourselves, are the
authors who reach this target audience most effectively? |
|
Well,
all the above criteria apply. It's important for mainstream
authors to write material for reluctant readers. This confers
status on their material - 'We're reading Anthony Masters'…
'So are we!' Kids have to want to read. Therefore, the person
who's done most to motivate reluctant readers in recent years
is JK Rowling. The people, we find, who write best for reluctant
readers are often the people in closest contact with that
readership and are prepared to write for their audience, rather
than for themselves.
|
| 10.
Lindsey Fraser, of Scottish Book Trust, has described you
both as "a wonderful aberration in the world of children's
books", going on to speak enthusiastically of your "action-packed
events at the Edinburgh International Book Festival". What
has been the most memorable of your 'event' experiences. |
|
 We
can't put that out on the web! Anyone wishing the full details
will have to catch us late at night and ply us with beer…!
We did enjoy doing 'Shakespeare's Ghostwriter' at the Oxford
Union, where, under the painted gaze of luminaries and amid
the shades of politicians and princes, we had three hundred
and fifty kids jumping up, spinning round and sneezing every
time we said the word 'Macbeth'. (We said it a lot.)
[This is the American edition of Star
Bores, but available through Amazon's UK site.]
|
| 11.
Does being joint-authors present any pecuniary problems.
For example, I imagine your fee for school events is higher
than it would be if you were just one person, and therefore
might deter bookings. Equally, the advance and royalties
from publishers have to be divided between two people. |
| Not
necessarily. We have heard of others who are very expensive
all by themselves! Transportation costs are usually no higher
than for a single person, and in a workshop situation we
can spend more time one on one with the kids. Our fees have
to reflect the time we lose for writing by attending events
- but we are trying not to put ourselves beyond the financial
reach of anyone who wants us to visit. As for advances and
royalties…true - but we probably do twice the work of most
single authors! |
| 12.
Coming back to the Vernon Bright series... How did you ensure
that the 'science' was correct (for example the ideas contained
in Chapter 5, 'A Can of Wormholes') or are you both science
boffins? |
|
Well,
we've got our GCSEs and we watch Horizon, so we thought
we were pretty clued up. Our editor wasn't so sanguine,
and called in Trevor Day, who read Magnetic Banana and
then sent us a nine-paged single-spaced fax which began…'Did
you know there are eight different types of magnetism?…'
Since then, we've been very thorough in our research -
or we've chosen subjects like gravitons, which even scientists
aren't sure about!
|
| 13.
The Mad Myths series is illustrated by Tony Ross and you've
got a great cartoon-style illustrator, Geo Parkin, for this
series. Is it important for you that the illustrators get
things right? |
| Emphatically,
yes! Tony can produce images of incredible immediacy and
vitality with a few brush strokes, and Geo adds ideas to
our text that we wish we'd thought of ourselves. |
| 14.
Your first two books -- I Fell In Love With a Leather Jacket
and In Love With an Urban Gorilla -- were comprised of letters
exchanged between Sammy and her pen-pal Camille. Was one
of you Sammy and the other Camille? [see footnote] |
|
Yes. Barlow wrote the Sammy letters and Skidmore says
he wrote the letters from Camille….hang on a minute, there
aren't actually any letters from Camille to Sammy in the
books…Skidmore, come here! I want a word…
|
| 15.
The 'Lost Diary' series is not exclusively by you. Did
this change the way you wrote? |
|
No. We helped formulate the series, and we always varied
our text with a mixture of diary entries, newspaper
clippings, postcards, advertisements and other fake
regalia, which other writers didn't adopt.
|
|
FOOTNOTE to Q14 - The
letters in I
Fell In Love With a Leather Jacket and its
sequel are all from Sammy. These two titles were published
before ACHUKA began to review children's books and Q14,
we're ashamed to say, was based on a lazy reading of
the jacket blurb. The reply, however, was too entertaining
to edit out!
|
©
copyright 2001 ACHUKA
|