Authors in revolt against plans to vet them for school visits | Books | guardian.co.uk

| 1 Comment

Authors To Have To Pay To Be Vetted Before School Visits

Philip Pullman has led a chorus of protest from prominent children's authors over a new scheme that will require them to be vetted before they can visit schools. He called the plans "outrageous, demeaning and insulting" and said he wouldn't be appearing in schools again because of it.

Set up in response to the murders of Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells by school caretaker Ian Huntley in 2002, the Independent Safeguarding Authority will vet all individuals who work with children from October this year, requiring them to register with a national database for a fee of £64. Pullman compared the scheme to the notorious piece of legislation section 28, which banned the "promotion" of homosexuality in schools and for which David Cameron offered a public apology last week.

"It seems to be fuelled by the same combination of prurience, sexual fear and cold political calculation," the author of the bestselling His Dark Materials trilogy said today. "When you go into a school as an author or an illustrator you talk to a class at a time or else to the whole school. How on earth - how on earth - how in the world is anybody going to rape or assault a child in those circumstances? It's preposterous."

The Carnegie medal-winning author and screenwriter Frank Cottrell Boyce agreed with Pullman. "As an author you're never alone with a class," he said. "There's no possible reason for this, unless it's a revenue-raising scam."

This is important. Read the full article.

I'm not sure schools have yet been made aware of this situation.
As things stand at present, anyone coming in to work alongside children on a regular basis (a voluntary work placement, for example) has to provide a CRB check.
But schools have one-off visiting speakers all the time - in assemblies, in RE lessons, in topic-based events - and, as the article points out, in these circumstances the visitor is always accompanied by other members of staff.
It will be an absurdly and insultingly unnecessary hassle for all concerned.

1 Comment

I was appalled to read this on the weekend. Who will suffer? Why, the very people it is ostensibly designed to protect - the children. They will miss out on being inspired and motivated by the writers who are understandably offended by it.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by achuka published on July 12, 2009 7:20 PM.

Guardian Review: Eating Things on Sticks by Anne Fine | Books | The Guardian was the previous entry in this blog.

'The Year That It Rained Cows': The silly, strange and fascinating world of books for the under-12s - Features, Books - The Independent is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.2.2